On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 4:26 PM, David Jarvis <thangalin@gmail.com> wrote:
> shared_buffers = 1GB
> temp_buffers = 32MB
> work_mem = 32MB
> maintenance_work_mem = 64MB
> effective_cache_size = 256MB
Shouldn't effective_cache_size be significantly larger?
--
Rob Wultsch
wultsch@gmail.com