Re: bg worker: general purpose requirements

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: bg worker: general purpose requirements
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTikD6FMg9ioeJTwShA6gP=qK1beyTvF9cSLwLd-w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: bg worker: general purpose requirements  (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>)
Ответы Re: bg worker: general purpose requirements  (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch> wrote:
> On 09/21/2010 03:46 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Wait, are we in violent agreement here?  An overall limit on the
>> number of parallel jobs is exactly what I think *does* make sense.
>> It's the other knobs I find odd.
>
> Note that the max setting I've been talking about here is the maximum
> amount of *idle* workers allowed. It does not include busy bgworkers.

Oh, wow.  Is there another limit on the total number of bgworkers?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: What happened to the is_ family of functions proposal?
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: moving development branch activity to new git repo