On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 20:59, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 20:21, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>>> On tis, 2010-09-21 at 11:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> rather than global ignore patterns for *.a and *.so.[0-9]
>>>
>>> Probably rather *.so.[0-9.]+
>
>> Any particular reason not to just do .so.*?
>
> Just paranoia, I guess. I can't actually see a reason why we'd have
> any committable files in the tree matching that pattern. OTOH, we
> probably also need the same type of pattern for .sl and .dylib,
> so at some point a more conservative pattern would be wise.
Do we know what the exact pattern would be for .sl and .dylib? Are
they following the same basic pattern of .sl.<major>.<minor>?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/