Re: Application name patch - v4

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dimitri Fontaine
Тема Re: Application name patch - v4
Дата
Msg-id A2B6281C-8F03-4C48-A14C-F8B36E77A3C5@hi-media.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Application name patch - v4  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Application name patch - v4
Список pgsql-hackers
Le 30 nov. 2009 à 00:25, Tom Lane a écrit :
> The thing is that the libpq API treats application_name as a *property
> of the connection*.

Oh. Yeah.

> We could add a third keyword, say SET DEFAULT, that would have the
> behavior of setting the value in a fashion that would persist across
> resets.  I'm not sure that DEFAULT is exactly le mot juste here, but
> agreeing on a keyword would probably be the hardest part of making it
> happen.

I vaguely remember you explaining how hard it would be to be able to predict the value we RESET to as soon as we add
thisor that possibility. That's very vague, sorry, but only leaves a bad impression on the keyword choice
(bikeshedding,I should open a club). 

So what about SET CONNECTION application_name TO 'whatever'?

Regards,
--
dim






В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Block-level CRC checks