Re: data-checksums
От
George Neuner
Тема
Re: data-checksums
Дата
Msg-id
9q6a5d18j7llrp0pt3oq6orb0vugrio9o2@4ax.com
Список
Дерево обсуждения
data-checksums "Rakesh Kumar" <rakeshkumar464@mail.com>
Re: data-checksums Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: data-checksums "Rakesh Kumar" <rakeshkumar464@mail.com>
Re: data-checksums Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: data-checksums "Rakesh Kumar" <rakeshkumar464@mail.com>
Re: data-checksums Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Re: data-checksums "Rakesh Kumar" <rakeshkumar464@mail.com>
Re: data-checksums Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: data-checksums "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Sv: Re: data-checksums Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>
Re: Sv: Re: data-checksums Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Sv: Re: Sv: Re: data-checksums Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>
Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: data-checksums Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>
Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: data-checksums Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>
Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: data-checksums Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: data-checksums Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>
Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: data-checksums Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: data-checksums Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: data-checksums "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>
Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: data-checksums Thomas Poty <thomas.poty@gmail.com>
Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: data-checksums Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: data-checksums Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>
Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: data-checksums Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: data-checksums Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Hi i like to unscribe me, sorry for the incovenient. Moises Lima dos Anjos <mozart08@gmail.com>
"On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 20:02:37 +0100, "Rakesh Kumar" wrote: >Hello Mr. Pedantic, > >> noticeable != huge. > >and noticeable != small/negligible either, at least from English >point of view. small != negligible. The word "noticable" does not imply any particular magnitude of event. It means only that can be observed. There is no canon technical usage. In layman's use, "noticable" often *does* imply that an effect is small, and that one might not see it if not looking specifically for it. Unfortunately, English is a slippery language. Perhaps technical documents should be written in Sumerian. YMMV, George
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Moises Lima dos Anjos
Дата: