Re: index scan cost
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: index scan cost |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9919.1216355851@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | index scan cost (Jeff Frost <jeff@frostconsultingllc.com>) |
Ответы |
Mailing list hacked by spammer?
Re: index scan cost |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jeff Frost <jeff@frostconsultingllc.com> writes: > I have two postgresql servers. One runs 8.3.1, the other 8.3.3. On the 8.3.1 > machine, the index scans are being planned extremely low cost: > Index Scan using ix_email_entity_thread on email_entity (cost=0.00..4.59 > rows=1 width=1031) (actual time=0.095..0.120 rows=4 loops=1) > Index Cond: (email_thread = 375629157) > Index Scan using ix_email_entity_thread on email_entity (cost=0.00..2218.61 > rows=1151 width=931) (actual time=0.094..0.111 rows=4 loops=1) > Index Cond: (email_thread = 375629157) This isn't a "cost" problem, this is a "stats" problem. Why does the second server think 1151 rows will be returned? Try comparing the pg_stats entries for the email_thread column on both servers ... seems like they must be significantly different. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: