On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 15:22, Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:45:05PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> You probably want to do this on backbranches as well. Otherwise we're
>> going to have to maintain it in some branches and not in some (which
>> we *will* make mistakes if we try). And keeping it in there but not
>> maintaining it is even worse...
>
> TTBOMK the file has never been maintained in backbranched but always carried
> the release time status. I fail to see the advantage here.
Hmm, so we've basically been shipping out of date changelogs in
backbranches? That seems Bad (TM)..
Anyway, I vote for removing it there as well, but if you wan to keep
it, I don't care *that* much.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/