Re: pgindent run coming

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> We don't have a lot of time for research.  Maybe the best thing is to
>> just manually remove stat from the typedef list (along with anything
>> else that clearly shouldn't be there)?

> I agree we are running out of time so I will be running pgindent in one
> hour using the same BSD-based typedef method I have used in the past. 
> If a better typedef list appears, we can always rerun pgindent.

Why not compare the BSD list with the new one and adopt anything that
seems sane?  We know that your old method misses quite a lot of typedefs.
        regards, tom lane