Re: Deleted WAL files held open by backends in Linux
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Deleted WAL files held open by backends in Linux |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 964.1259680366@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Deleted WAL files held open by backends in Linux ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Deleted WAL files held open by backends in Linux
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Is there a reasonably cheap way to check whether the backend has a
> WAL file open and whether that one is the current append target?
Detecting whether we have a WAL file open is trivial (just look at
the static variable holding the file descriptor). Determining whether
it's still the current append target is not so cheap though; it would
require examining shared-memory status which means taking a lock on
that status (and it's a high-traffic lock already).
We could have the open WAL file dropped if stale as a side-effect
anytime we have occasion to examine that shared state anyway. But
in a nearly-read-only session such as your example I'm not sure that
would happen often enough to fix the problem.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: