Re: Overhauling GUCS

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Overhauling GUCS
Дата
Msg-id 9606.1212804041@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Overhauling GUCS  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Not surprising really. It is a simple adjustment to make and it also is
> easy to spot when its a problem. However it is not trivial to test for
> (in terms of time and effort). I know 10 is wrong and so do you.

Sure.  But what is right?  I'm afraid to just push it to (say) 100
because of the possibility of O(N^2) behavior in eqjoinsel.  Somebody
needs to do some measurements on somewhat realistic scenarios.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Overhauling GUCS
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: We have a launch abort ... PG update releases will be delayed