Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The patch to c.h certainly had no compunction about possibly changing
>> the behavior for Cygwin:

> Maybe we need to divorce Cygwin and Win32.

That seems like probably an overreaction.  The impression I got was that
this patch had actually moved the MSVC port quite a long way towards
being like the Cygwin port.  It was just sloppy :-(.

Magnus, this was your patch, can you see about fixing the collateral
damage to the Cygwin build?
        regards, tom lane