Re: Additional psql requirements
От
Dave Page
Тема
Re: Additional psql requirements
Дата
Msg-id
937d27e10807250140x1e28edc6iec5986987db74917@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: Additional psql requirements (Pavel Stehule)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Additional psql requirements Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Additional psql requirements ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Additional psql requirements Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Additional psql requirements "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Additional psql requirements daveg <daveg@sonic.net>
Re: Additional psql requirements "Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Re: Additional psql requirements "Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Additional psql requirements "Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Re: Additional psql requirements Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Additional psql requirements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2008/7/25 Dave Page : >> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:52 AM, daveg wrote: >> >>> It seems to me that a sql-like client side scripting language should be as >>> similar as possible to plpgsql. Pgscript looks a bit like plpgsql, but is >>> pretty much incompatible with it for no particularly obvious reason. >> >> pgScript originally used a c-like syntax when it was pgUnitTest iirc. >> The new version is designed to be familiar to users of T-SQL. > > it is little bit unhappy - it's like T-SQL, but it isn't T-SQL - and > it's far to plpgsql I see no point in replicating pl/pgsql. Better to implement anonymous blocks in the server for that. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Bjorn Munch
Дата: