Re: Expanded Objects and Order By

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Paul Ramsey
Тема Re: Expanded Objects and Order By
Дата
Msg-id 933D0559-FAC7-4970-9573-0CFF34CCB444@cleverelephant.ca
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Expanded Objects and Order By  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Expanded Objects and Order By  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Expanded Objects and Order By  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Thank the Maker, it is reproduceable: returning an expanded header in the _in function is not appreciated in a very
narrownumber of cases. 

Edit arrayfuncs.c:array_in(), change the return line thus:
    // PG_RETURN_ARRAYTYPE_P(retval);    PG_RETURN_DATUM(expand_array(PointerGetDatum(retval), CurrentMemoryContext,
my_extra));

And here is a small test case that exercises it:

CREATE TABLE orderby_expanded ( id integer, a integer[]
);

INSERT INTO orderby_expanded (id, a) VALUES (1, ARRAY[1,2]);

-- works
SELECT id, a FROM orderby_expanded
ORDER BY a = '{1,2}'::integer[];

-- ERROR:  could not find pathkey item to sort
SELECT id FROM orderby_expanded
ORDER BY a = '{1,2}'::integer[];

-- works
SELECT id FROM orderby_expanded
ORDER BY a = ARRAY[1,2];




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Releasing in September
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Releasing in September