Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Yang Zhang
Тема Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL
Дата
Msg-id 9066fa251002221035s38a1a72j5a73d301553a72b@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL  (Alban Hertroys <dalroi@solfertje.student.utwente.nl>)
Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> hello
>
> the speed depends on setting of working_memory. Try to increase a working_memory
>
> set working_memory to '10MB';

It's already at

tpcc=# show work_mem;
 work_mem
----------
 20000kB
(1 row)

I also wouldn't have imagined an external merge-sort as being very
memory-intensive--wouldn't it only enough buffer space to read 2x and
write 1x in big-enough chunks for mostly-sequential access?
--
Yang Zhang
http://www.mit.edu/~y_z/

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Richard Broersma
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL
Следующее
От: Yang Zhang
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL