Re: Index not always being used
От
John Scalia
Тема
Re: Index not always being used
Дата
Msg-id
8D7F747E-132E-4543-9933-583DE249850F@gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: Index not always being used (Holger Jakobs)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Index not always being used John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com>
Re: Index not always being used Holger Jakobs <holger@jakobs.com>
Re: Index not always being used John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com>
Re: Index not always being used Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Good to know, thanks
Sent from my iPad
Hi,
A good solution would be to add another B-Tree index. The planner would choose this one in case of a search using "=" and the trigram index when using "like", "similar to" or "~" (regexp).
A trigram index is not suitable for a "=" comparison.
Regards,
Holger
Am 29.08.19 um 16:15 schrieb John Scalia:I’ve got a table with approximately 5.5 million rows, and one column that is frequently searched is of type varchar(50) and we just put a trigram index on it. Now, if we search “where bld_city = ‘baskingridge’”, explain says a sequential table scan is going to be used, but if I change the query to use “where bold_city like ‘basking%’”, then explain correctly shows that a bitmap index scan will be performed. Why would these two forms use different approaches? I’m a bit confused. — Jay Sent from my iPad--Holger Jakobs, Bergisch Gladbach
instant messaging: xmpp:holger@jakobs.com
+49 178 9759012 oder +49 2202 817157
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления