[GENERAL] Avoiding repeating simple field definitions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Guyren Howe
Тема [GENERAL] Avoiding repeating simple field definitions
Дата
Msg-id 8A417EFD-AF9A-4577-8A76-A01D50860421@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] Avoiding repeating simple field definitions  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Re: [GENERAL] Avoiding repeating simple field definitions  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
Список pgsql-general
I saw a thing somewhere about avoiding repeating the same field definitions. So an app I’m working on uses an exactly 6-character sting as an identifier, which appears in many places.

IIRC, the thing I read proposed defining a type AS IMPLICIT, but I’m not sure. Mainly because the docs urge caution with using AS IMPLICIT.

Thoughts?

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Job
Дата:
Сообщение: R: [GENERAL] (solved) R: Very strange problem on index
Следующее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Avoiding repeating simple field definitions