Re: Readd use of TAP subtests

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes:

> Now that subtests in TAP are supported again, I want to correct the
> great historical injustice of 7912f9b7dc9e2d3f6cd81892ef6aa797578e9f06 
> and put those subtests back.

The updated Test::More version requirement also gives us done_testing()
(added in 0.88), which saves us from the constant maintenance headache
of updating the test counts every time.  Do you fancy switching the
tests you're modifying anyway to that?


- ilmari