>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> I'm +1 for backpatching it. It may be operating as designed by
>> PeterE ten years ago, but it's not operating as designed by the SQL
>> standard.
Tom> By that argument, *anyplace* where we're missing a SQL-spec
Tom> feature is a back-patchable bug. I don't buy it.
But this is a feature we already claimed to actually support (it's
listed in sql_features with a bunch of unqualified YES entries), but in
fact doesn't work properly.
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)