Re: [BUGS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP
От | Greg Stark |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87mzt67t3h.fsf@stark.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP (Mark Shewmaker <mark@primefactor.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP
Re: [BUGS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 21:21 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Comments? Can anyone confirm whether DB2 or other databases allow > > ungrouped column references with HAVING? Mysql treats ungrouped columns as an assertion that those columns will all be equal for the group and it can pick an arbitrary one. Essentially it does an implicit "first(x) AS x". The expected use case is for things like: select count(*),a.* from a,bwhere a.pk = b.a_fkgroup by a.pk I've noticed quite frequently scenarios where this idiom would be very handy. I usually either end up rewriting the query to have nested subqueries so I can push the grouping into the subquery. This doesn't always work though and sometimes I end up listing several, sometimes dozens, of columns like "first(x) AS x" or else end up -- greg
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: