Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> [ scratches head... ] I don't see why we'd get different results.
> I see four warnings about undeclared functions in read.c if the
> inclusion isn't there. Is there perhaps some change in your sources
> that you missed committing?
Bizarre -- upon reversing your change to read.c and recompiling, I now
get the warnings. I could have sworn that I'd double-checked that I'd
fixed the necessary dependencies for the value node change, but
apparently not.
Mea culpa, and sorry for the sloppiness.
-Neil