Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server))

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server))
Дата
Msg-id 8774.958757789@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server))  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server))  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> All the sequential catalog scans that return one row are gone.  What has
> not been done is adding indexes for scans returning more than one row.

I've occasionally wondered whether we can't find a way to use the
catcaches for searches that can return multiple rows.  It'd be easy
enough to add an API for catcache that could return multiple rows given
a nonunique search key.  The problem is how to keep the catcache up to
date with underlying reality for this kind of query.  Deletions of rows
will be handled by the existing catcache invalidation mechanism, but
how can we know when some other backend has added a row that will match
a search condition?  Haven't seen an answer short of scanning the table
every time, which makes the catcache no win at all.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: HEADS UP: CVSROOT location changed ...
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: question about index cost estimates