"Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> writes:
> What I am proposing is to keep index unusable for existing transactions.
> The index is available for all new transactions even if there are unfinished
> existing transactions.
Ah thanks, that makes a lot more sense. Sorry for the false alarm.
-- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com