"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> Why does a collation have a schema?
>
> Because the SQL spec says so. Also, if we don't put them in schemas,
> we have no nice way to distinguish built-in and user-defined collations,
> which creates a problem for pg_dump.
Out of curiosity, what is a "user-defined collation"? Are there SQL statements
to go around declaring what order code points should be sorted in? That seems
like it would be... quite tedious!
-- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication
support!