Re: Tuplestore should remember the memory context it's created in

Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> AFAICS it is always a bug to be in a different memory context
>> in tuplestore_put* than in tuplestore_begin_heap(), so it would be more
>> robust to not put the burden on the callers.

> I thought there were comments specifically explaining why it was done
> that way but I don't recall what they said.

I think it was just a performance optimization.  It's probably not
measurable though; even in the in-memory case there's at least a palloc
inside the put() function, no?
        regards, tom lane