Re: pgsql: ecpg: Output dir, source dir, stamp file argument for preproc/*.
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgsql: ecpg: Output dir, source dir, stamp file argument for preproc/*. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 822625.1658179641@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pgsql: ecpg: Output dir, source dir, stamp file argument for preproc/*. (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pgsql: ecpg: Output dir, source dir, stamp file argument for preproc/*.
|
| Список | pgsql-committers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> Jul 18 16:48:25 ./src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/parse.pl: Bareword file handle opened at line 30, column 1. See pages
202,204of PBP. ([InputOutput::ProhibitBarewordFileHandles] Severity: 5)
> Jul 18 16:48:25 ./src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/parse.pl: Bareword file handle opened at line 31, column 1. See pages
202,204of PBP. ([InputOutput::ProhibitBarewordFileHandles] Severity: 5)
> afaict that's bogus. It's unnecessary that the code uses "our" instead of
> "my", but there's no bareword there and replacing our with my fixes that
> complaint.
Ah, I think I've got it. Per "man perlfunc":
"our" has the same scoping rules as "my" or "state", meaning that
it is only valid within a lexical scope. Unlike "my" and "state",
which both declare new (lexical) variables, "our" only creates an
alias to an existing variable: a package variable of the same name.
Since there's not actually any such package variable, the net effect is
that the first argument of open() is an undeclared name. I can more or
less see why perl might treat that the same as a bareword, though I
definitely agree that this error message is more confusing than helpful.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: