Re: some pg_dump query code simplification
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: some pg_dump query code simplification |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8085.1535493957@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: some pg_dump query code simplification (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: some pg_dump query code simplification
Re: some pg_dump query code simplification |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> I wonder- what if we had an option to pg_dump to explicitly tell it what
> the server's version is and then have TAP tests to run with different
> versions?
Uh ... telling it what the version is doesn't make that true, so I'd
have no confidence in a test^H^H^H^Hkluge done that way. The way
to test is to point it at an *actual* back-branch server.
Andrew has a buildfarm module that does precisely that, although
I'm not sure what its test dataset is --- probably the regression
database from each branch. I also have a habit of doing such testing
manually whenever I touch version-sensitive parts of pg_dump.
Dunno about the idea of running the pg_dump TAP tests against back
branches. I find that code sufficiently unreadable that maintaining
several more copies of it doesn't sound like fun at all.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: