Re: Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bryn Llewellyn
Тема Re: Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter
Дата
Msg-id 7B50CB1F-0F02-4BA5-8E1B-22B3A52BAB8A@yugabyte.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:

bryn@yugabyte.com wrote:

The DO block runs without error and reports "INFO:  42". This is an unambiguous semantic error because "a" is declared "constant"… Is this a known issue?

Thanks for the instant response, Tom. It's uncanny that you spotted this on Saturday 30-Apr and I spotted it just three days later on Tuesday 3-May. One of us must be psychic.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter
Следующее
От: Steve Baldwin
Дата:
Сообщение: Logical replication 'possible' problem