Re: Building with musl in CI and the build farm

On 31.03.24 15:34, walther@technowledgy.de wrote:
>> I'd rather adapt one of the existing tasks, to avoid increasing CI 
>> costs unduly.
> 
> I looked into this and I think the only task that could be changed is 
> the SanityCheck.

I think SanityCheck should run a simple, "average" environment, like the 
current Debian one.  Otherwise, niche problems with musl or multi-arch 
or whatever will throw off the entire build pipeline.