Re: unlink for DROPs after releasing locks (was Re: Should I implement DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: unlink for DROPs after releasing locks (was Re: Should I implement DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY?)
Дата
Msg-id 7743.1339685140@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: unlink for DROPs after releasing locks (was Re: Should I implement DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY?)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: unlink for DROPs after releasing locks (was Re: Should I implement DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY?)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Is RESOURCE_RELEASE_AFTER_LOCKS actually used for anything?  Is it
> just for extensions?

I'm too lazy to go look, but it certainly ought to be in use.
The idea is that that's the phase for post-lock-release cleanup,
and anything that can possibly be postponed till after releasing
locks certainly should be ...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Backup docs
Следующее
От: Phil Sorber
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: libpq compression