Re: Anticipatory privileges
| От | John D. Burger | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Anticipatory privileges | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 773D21A2-92D0-45EC-A9AD-91FB566E6691@mitre.org обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: Anticipatory privileges (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: Anticipatory privileges
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-general | 
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> If I am reading the (7.4) docs correctly, privileges can be granted
>> only with respect to tables that exist at the time the GRANT command
>> is given
> Yes.
In fact, I have to individually grant access to each table, and any
associated sequences, yes?  How dangerous is it to UPDATE pg_class
directly, perhaps copying the relacl column for a table that I've
done by hand with GRANT.  I'm thinking something like this:
=> grant all on annotations to public;
=> update pg_class set relacl = (select relacl from pg_class where
relname = 'annotations')
    where relnamespace = (select oid from pg_namespace where nspname =
'public');
This will "grant" access to indexes and other stuff that may be
unnecessary, but is this a sound approach?  (By the way, are there in
fact any other kinds of objects that I may need to allow access to,
other than tables and sequences?)
Another solution to my access control issues is to change the owner
of the tables and sequences.  Can I safely do this with an UPDATE on
pg_class?
Thanks, and sorry if these are dumb questions, but I haven't been
able to glean the answers directly from the docs.
- John Burger
   MITRE
		
	В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: