Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README
Дата
Msg-id
7675.1529468234@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README (Michael Paquier)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Michael Paquier writes: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:59:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> No, but it needs some adjustments. I'll go fix what I checked. > c992dca2 did not change anything about ldap packages. Are the ones > listed for RHEL and FreeBSD correct? No, that patch was more-or-less-unrelated cleanup. The question is still open about what we want to list as required packages here. It seems somewhat reasonable to assume that people have already managed to build with the option of interest (eg --with-ldap) before they come to these test suites ... or am I wrong about that? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата: