Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Chapman Flack
Тема
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added
Дата
Msg-id
7346ffce-2d20-5a56-5940-5a96359fcfd3@anastigmatix.net
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
'infinity'::Interval should be added Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>
Re: 'infinity'::Interval should be added Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>
On 12/17/18 5:37 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> postgres=# select 'infinity'::timestamp = 'infinity'::timestamp;
>  ?column?
> ----------
>  t

I'm not persuaded that's a good idea, and would prefer to see an
is_infinite() predicate, and an = operator that complains. But if
the above is current behavior, I wouldn't say I feel strongly enough
to want to change it.

> postgres=# select 'infinity'::timestamp - 'infinity'::timestamp;
> 
> would be zero rather than an error, for least surprise.

Here, though, I really think an error is appropriate. Getting a
definite finite result from two operands that really mean "I am
huge but otherwise unknown" seems very surprising to me.

-Chap

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
От: Kevin Grittner
Дата:
FAQ