On 1/17/23 11:49, Wiwwo Staff wrote:
> Thank you Adrian, thank you David!
> So, it turns out, it *is* indeed an arbitrary constant...
> I have been answered many times RTFM, it is actually the first time I
> have being answered RTF source code.
> (I searched for 1663 in PG docs, it is there, although not really
> "intuitive").
>
> Allow me to humbly propose to maybe at least write somewhere in the DOCs
> in a clear way: "This is a number you should know, and it is arbitrary,
> and in some functions it will be represented as 'base' ".
> It is fundamental to know this when one uses pg_waldump, for example.
>
> Not to start a flame war here, just humbly proposing...
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/storage-file-layout.html
"The pg_default tablespace is not accessed through pg_tblspc, but
corresponds to PGDATA/base. Similarly, the pg_global tablespace is not
accessed through pg_tblspc, but corresponds to PGDATA/global."
>
> Thanks all again!
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com