Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: why partition pruning doesn't work? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 7142.1527868419@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: why partition pruning doesn't work? (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?
Re: why partition pruning doesn't work? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> I think the patch is right if we were to handle only SQLValueFunction,
> but the bigger picture here is that we aren't evaluating stable
> functions before run-time partition pruning happens. I was under the
> impression that the stable functions/expressions get evaluated and
> folded into a constant just before the execution begins since a stable
> function produces the same output for same input during one execution
> invocation. But I am not able to find where we do that and probably we
> don't do that at all.
We don't; there was a patch floating around to make that happen, but
it hasn't been updated lately.
I agree though that it seems strange to special-case SQLValueFunction
rather than any-stable-expression. As long as the evaluation happens
at executor start (i.e. with the query's run-time snapshot) it should
be reasonable to simplify any stable expression.
It's worth questioning whether this is a bug fix or an improvement.
If the latter, it probably ought to wait for v12.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: