Composite types or composite keys?
| От | Tony Theodore |
|---|---|
| Тема | Composite types or composite keys? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6D46FD23-2011-4E52-BD54-09FC54A0C117@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: Composite types or composite keys?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Hi,
I was reading about composite types and wondering if I should use them instead of composite keys. I currently have
tableslike this:
create table products (
source_system text,
product_id text,
description text,
...
primary key (source_system, product_id)
);
create table inventory (
source_system text,
product_id text,
qty int,
...
foreign key (source_system, product_id) references products
);
and it means having to add the “source_system" column to many queries. Would something like:
create type product as (
source_system text,
product_id text
);
create table products (
product product,
description text,
...
primary key(product)
);
create table inventory (
product product,
qty numeric,
...
foreign key (product) references products
);
be a correct use of composite types? I rarely need to see the columns separately, so having to write
“(product).product_id”won’t happen much in practice.
Thanks,
Tony
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: