"Michael Paesold" <mpaesold@gmx.at> writes:
> Can you remember regressions in stable branches in the past?
Yes. Relax. If this were a data-corruption-in-the-backend issue,
I might feel that it mandates an immediate re-release. But it isn't
and it doesn't. You'll note that Michael M. himself didn't bother to
backpatch the fix on first discovery ... so why should anyone else
take it more seriously?
regards, tom lane