Re: pg14b1 stuck in lazy_scan_prune/heap_page_prune of pg_statistic
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg14b1 stuck in lazy_scan_prune/heap_page_prune of pg_statistic |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 657425.1623002350@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg14b1 stuck in lazy_scan_prune/heap_page_prune of pg_statistic (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg14b1 stuck in lazy_scan_prune/heap_page_prune of pg_statistic
Re: pg14b1 stuck in lazy_scan_prune/heap_page_prune of pg_statistic |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 at 18:35, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
>> However, I also found an autovacuum chewing 100% CPU, and it appears the
>> problem is actually because autovacuum has locked a page of pg-statistic, and
>> every other process then gets stuck waiting in the planner. I checked a few
>> and found these:
> My suspicion is that for some tuple on that page
> HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() returns HEAPTUPLE_DEAD for a tuple that it
> thinks should have been cleaned up by heap_page_prune, but isn't. This
> would result in an infinite loop in lazy_scan_prune where the
> condition on vacuumlazy.c:1800 will always be true, but the retry will
> not do the job it's expected to do.
Since Justin's got a debugger on the process already, it probably
wouldn't be too hard to confirm or disprove that theory by stepping
through the code.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: