Re: alternative to PG_CATCH

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: alternative to PG_CATCH
Дата
Msg-id 6339394a-cb5b-077f-1e3c-97fcc395b1f4@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: alternative to PG_CATCH  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: alternative to PG_CATCH  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 2019-10-28 13:45, Robert Haas wrote:
> In theory, the do_rethrow variable could conflict with a symbol
> declared in the surrounding scope, but that doesn't seem like it's a
> problem worth getting worked up about.

Right.  A PG_TRY block also declares other local variables for internal 
use without much care about namespacing.  If it becomes a problem, it's 
easy to address.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add const qualifiers to internal range type APIs
Следующее
От: Eugen Konkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Does 'instead of delete' trigger support modification of OLD