Hi, thank you for your work with this subject.
While I was reviewing your code, I noticed that your patch conflicts with another patch [0] that been committed.
[0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BhUKGJkOiOCa%2Bmag4BF%2BzHo7qo%3Do9CFheB8%3Dg6uT5TUm2gkvA%40mail.gmail.com
On 28.03.2024 13:12, Anthonin Bonnefoy wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the review.
As for the proposed patch, the following part should handle the temp tables too:
True, I've missed the local blocks. I've updated the patch:
- read_rate and write_rate now include local block usage
- I've added a specific output for reporting local blocks instead of combining them in the same output.
Regards,
Anthonin
--
Regards,
Alena Rybakina
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company