"Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> writes:
> On Nov 9, 2007 5:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> [ thinks for a bit... ] It might be possible to get rid of the keyword
>> and have RETURN QUERY be recognized by an ad-hoc strcmp test, much like
>> the various direction keywords in FETCH have been handled without making
>> them real keywords. It'd be a bit uglier but it'd avoid making QUERY
>> be effectively a reserved word.
> It's not uncommon to have auditing triggers store things in tables
> with fields named query in them. I know I have a few places that do
> this...
It turned out to be a very easy change, so it's done: QUERY isn't a
reserved word anymore.
regards, tom lane