Re: Fix out-of-bounds in the function GetCommandTagName

David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> I think the change makes sense. I don't see any good reason to define
> COMMAND_TAG_NEXTTAG or force the compiler's hand when it comes to
> sizing that array.
> Clearly, Coverity does not understand that we'll never call any of
> those GetCommandTag* functions with COMMAND_TAG_NEXTTAG.

+1, but would this also allow us to get rid of any default:
cases in switches on command tags?

            regards, tom lane