Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Дата
Msg-id 5764.1252606619@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Sep 10, 2009, at 10:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I thought the idea was to
>>> provide the same power as sprintf, eg field width controls, numeric
>>> formatting options, etc.

> no - we have to_char function, why we need different formatting system?

Why do we need this at all, when we have the concatenation operator?
I think the point of it is that people are used to how sprintf works.
So it should work as nearly like sprintf as possible.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Следующее
От: "David E. Wheeler"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types