Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'

On 2/29/16 10:33 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
>> >Given the audience for this, I think it'd probably be OK to just
>> >provide a function that does this, instead of DDL.
> That seems like a promising idea. Can you suggest some possible usage?

pg_extension_dependency( regextension, any )

where "any" would be all the other reg* types. That should be a lot less 
work to code up than messing with the grammar.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com