Re: public synonym
| От | michael@sqlexec.com |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: public synonym |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 568ECA21.20702@sqlexec.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | public synonym (Eugene Yin <eugeneymail@ymail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: public synonym
|
| Список | pgsql-sql |
You can infer the context by first setting the search_path variable. You can set it initially in your connection or do it for a database context or even a role context
SET search_path = MASTER_USER, public, pg_catalog;
ALTER DATABASE whatever SET search_path = MASTER_USER, public, pg_catalog;
ALTER ROLE whoever SET search_path = MASTER_USER, public, pg_catalog;
Then you can continue to let the tables be non-qualified. bye bye synonyms!
Regards
Michael
SET search_path = MASTER_USER, public, pg_catalog;
ALTER DATABASE whatever SET search_path = MASTER_USER, public, pg_catalog;
ALTER ROLE whoever SET search_path = MASTER_USER, public, pg_catalog;
Then you can continue to let the tables be non-qualified. bye bye synonyms!
Regards
Michael
Thursday, January 7, 2016 3:17 PMPostgreSQL ver 9.4.5. Linux OS.Application: Web BasedPlatform:App Server (java) --> jdbc call --> Database Server (PostgreSQL)I do know that PostgreSQL does not support the public synonym. Now, for a user schema (let's call it MASTER_USER), if I coded in the stored function/procedure like the following, without using a public synonym to identify the table name:select user_name from user_info_tablethen access it from the Java (web app) side via the JDBC call to the database, will that work?OR,I must use the identifier inside the sql, such as:select user_name from MASTER_USER.user_info_table?I come from the Oracle world, there I first create the public synonym for the table, then in the stored procedure I just directly reference the table with no need to identify the table with a schema name. Like to know how it work under the PostgreSQL.ThanksEugene
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: