On 2015-11-27 4:31 AM, NTPT wrote:
> Thanx for help, I grab the source code that match old cluster fs
> backup.
>
> However: Should it run fine compiled with recent gcc 4.9.3 ?
You realize how old 9.0 is, right? And you understand how nonsensical
your question is? How can you guarantee that code compiles properly on a
compiler which is released years after you write the code?
>
> while compiled with this gcc , I got a lot of strange errors like
>
> ERROR: could not identify an ordering operator for type name at
> character 3336
> HINT: Use an explicit ordering operator or modify the query.
>
> with \dt or \list or other commands and select.
>
>
> Hovever compiling it with gcc 3.4.6 and everythig works.
>
> Is it intended (expected) behavior or a compiller bug (Being on
> Gentoo, compiller bug scary me a lot).
>
> thanx
>
jan