Re: Summary of plans to avoid the annoyance of Freezing

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: Summary of plans to avoid the annoyance of Freezing
Дата
Msg-id 55C8EBA6.90908@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Summary of plans to avoid the annoyance of Freezing  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Summary of plans to avoid the annoyance of Freezing  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 08/10/2015 10:31 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Freezing is not a necessary pre-condition for either of those things, I
> am happy to say. There is confusion here because for ( 1 ) the shrink
> was performed after freezing, but when you have access to the epoch
> there is no need for exhaustive freezing - only in special cases, as
> noted. If we are lucky those special cases will mean a massive reduction
> in I/O. For ( 2 ) a normal VACUUM is sufficient and as Robert observes,
> maybe just HOT is enough.

Yeah, saw your explanation on this on the other thread.  Good point.

Question: does regular vacuum update the visibility map in the same way
vacuum freeze does?

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Janes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PENDING_LIST_CLEANUP_SIZE - maximum size of GIN pending list Re: HEAD seems to generate larger WAL regarding GIN index
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: checkpointer continuous flushing