Re: role self-revocation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: role self-revocation
Дата
Msg-id 554134.1646865318@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: role self-revocation  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> So CREATE ROLE will assign ownership of AND membership in the newly created
> role to the session_user

I would NOT have it automatically assign membership in the new role,
even though the SQL spec says so.  We've not done that historically
and it doesn't seem desirable.  In particular, it's *really* not
desirable for a user (role with LOGIN).

> I'm fine with this.  It does introduce an OWNER concept to roles and so at
> minimum we need to add:
> ALTER ROLE foo OWNER TO { new_owner | CURRENT_ROLE | CURRENT_USER |
> SESSION_USER }

Agreed.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Nathan Bossart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Postgres restart in the middle of exclusive backup and the presence of backup_label file
Следующее
От: "Imseih (AWS), Sami"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum