Re: Replication identifiers, take 4

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Replication identifiers, take 4
Дата
Msg-id 55403B2D.8040401@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Replication identifiers, take 4  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Replication identifiers, take 4
Список pgsql-hackers
On 4/24/15 4:29 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Shouldn't this be backed up by pg_dump(all?)?
> 
> Given it deals with LSNs and is, quite fundamentally due to concurrency, non transactional, I doubt it's worth it.
Theother side's slots also aren't going to be backed up as pg dump obviously can't know about then. So the represented
datawon't make much sense.
 

I agree it might not be the best match.  But we should consider that we
used to say, a backup by pg_dumpall plus configuration files is a
complete backup.  Now we have replication slots and possibly replication
identifiers and maybe similar features in the future that are not
covered by this backup method.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dave Jones
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Temporal extensions
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: shared_libperl, shared_libpython