Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 553917AB.8030007@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0 (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/20/2015 07:37 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>
> if (wco->commandType == CMD_INSERT)
> command = "INSERT-applicable ";
> else if (wco->commandType == CMD_UPDATE)
> command = "UPDATE-applicable ";
> else if (wco->commandType == CMD_DELETE)
> command = "DELETE-applicable ";
> else if (wco->commandType == CMD_SELECT)
> command = "SELECT-applicable ";
>
> ereport(ERROR,
> (errcode(ERRCODE_WITH_CHECK_OPTION_VIOLATION),
> errmsg("new row violates %sWITH CHECK OPTION %sfor \"%s\"",
> command ? command : "",
> wco->secBarrier ? "(originally security barrier) ":"",
> wco->viewname),
> val_desc ? errdetail("Failing row contains %s.", val_desc) :
> 0));
That code in ExecWithCheckOptions is not translatable. See style guide:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/nls-programmer.html#NLS-GUIDELINES
- Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: