On 04/17/2015 09:02 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I'm slightly surprised that Heikki now wants
> to use an infomask2 bit (if that is what you mean),
No, I don't.
> because he wanted to preserve those by doing the MagicOffsetNumber
> thing.
Yes, that's the way to go.
Glad we cleared that up :-).
- Heikki